23andMe: Good News?

-
From 23andMe email last week

Recently in genealogy DNA circles there has been a lot of worry about the future of 23andMe, the second-largest DNA database. There is reason for worry, as Kitty Cooper said in a September blog post: "23andme has been in the news this week because its entire board, except its founder, Anne Wojcicki, resigned over her plan to take it private again. It went public in 2021 but has yet to turn a profit and the WSJ reports that it will run out of cash next year." 

Cooper asks, "Why is 23andme not profitable? ...Discovering what health issues you might be susceptible to because of your DNA is not a big motivator for getting tested. Many Americans want to know their ethnic roots, for example, do they really have a native American ancestor? Genealogists may be the largest group who are interested in these tests in order to better understand their family history and find new relatives. Therefore once Ancestry.com started selling DNA tests, within a few years its market share exceeded 23andme’s by more than double." Now the Ancestry DNA database is as large as all the other sites, combined [1].

As Cooper notes, a DNA test is a one-time purchase. The other genealogy DNA sites bring in sustainable income in other ways, but 23andMe has only recently started to do that, with "23andMe+ Premium." I paid for this service to get access to their ancient DNA matches, which they call Historical Matches. Read more about this on their blog.

My largest match there is tiny (0.11%) to "Late Antique Period Roman R31." Here are some of the other top matches:


One drawback of Historical Matches is that there is no way to download the information besides screenshots or saving the pages as PDFs. 

Records & Archives

I tested out Records & Archives™ immediately. So far, it provides only SSDI (Social Security Death Index) and 1950 US Census hints. In my mother's image in the tree you can see that there is a hint. Once accepted though, the profile shows no difference, and the record can't be downloaded or even seen from the profile.

The hint search is not robust and there are no actual records, just indices. However,I was heartened to see that 23andMe are taking notice of us, the genealogy community again. 

The last time we got a new genealogy feature was four years ago, with the genetic family tree. Adding record hints to the tree shows that 23andMe are paying attention to those who actually use their website.


23andMe: Pioneers in Consumer Autosomal DNA Testing

I had forgotten that 23andMe was not just an early leader in autosomal DNA testing, but were the pioneers. They were first to gamble on the consumer market, offering some health testing along with relative matching, continent-level ancestry, and excellent tools for comparing DNA segments with matches. 

Recently Bennett Greenspan was interviewed by Tim Jantzen at an Advanced DNA SIG meeting, where he described meeting with the 23andMe founders (30:55) and being impressed by their tech, then trying to recreate it with a slightly different process. FamilyTreeDNA ended up retesting all those early autosomal customers on the Illumina chip, which is what 23andMe had settled on. FamilyTreeDNA's FamilyFinder test was a game-changer in my DNA testing journey. The first DNA test I ever bought was a Y-DNA test for my daddy's Father's Day gift. When he was unable to spit into a tube near the end of his life, FTDNA were able add the autosomal test without resampling, and after my dad's death, upgrade him to Big Y.


Looking Ahead

The first test I took was with 23andMe, and those results have been a gift which continues to give me new matches every week for many years. The security breach changes in the site have diminished both the ease of use and the value of testing, but I remain thankful to the DNA pioneers. They led the way to an increasingly valuable genealogy record set. 

Those who are worried about a possible sale of the company or even sale of our DNA data might follow Roberta Estes' advice: 23andMe Trouble – Step-by-Step Instructions to Preserve Your Data and Matches. 

Best practice is backing up our data from every online site.

My advice to those who want to test, and have limited funds is  go with Ancestry.com. They have the largest database and very good analysis tools. Then upload your DNA data elsewhere as time and funds allow. Testing with 23andMe, especially now that they have a sale running, is a good value. They do not accept uploads, and are still the second-largest database.

1. https://thednageek.com/dna-tests/, https://support.ancestry.com/s/article/About-AncestryDNA


~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~  ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 


Share your story with us! send to m.strickland@skcgs.org


Comment

Subscribe



Valorie Zimmerman


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Looking for a Needle in a Haystack? GAME CHANGER at FamilySearch

-
Image
Generated with Bing ImageCreator (AI), March 13, 2024 Where is YOUR Needle, Your Missing Record? Genealogical Proof Standard When we use the GPS (Genealogical Proof Standard) as our guide, we all know that "exhaustive research" can be both tedious and exhausting. Is life long enough to search page by page through all the counties where all the members of a family might have lived, paid taxes, bought, leased or sold property, made a will or died intestate? It is possible that the new Full Text Search at FamilySearch will  eventually  allow us to do just that. It has been estimated that 75% or more of the records at FamilySearch were browsable but not searchable; the only indexes those found in the records themselves. Those records are certainly attainable by using those indexes and browsing to the record of interest, but the process is tedious, often frustrating, and slow. And once found, the record must be read and transcribed to be useful. This new Full Text Search tackles a...
Read more

What's the Question?

-
Image
We genealogists are often told by experienced researchers how important it is to begin with a research question. I resisted doing this for a long time, but now that I use a series of questions to guide my research, the search is more focused and actually finds more of the history of the family I'm investigating. I use a Google Doc as the  research proceeds, where I keep the question(s), the plan, timelines, checklist of resources to search, etc. all in one place. I've seen others use spreadsheets in the same way, perhaps splitting up things in tabs (Excel or Google Sheets). I prefer a document because I add source citations as I find them and I can begin writing up the case right there in the doc as the hypotheses are proven. Specific Questions in Previous Successes As beginners we often have no clue how much and what details we already know about a person, event or relationship, so it's hard to specify what we want to know. But when looking back at successful research, it ...
Read more

Help Save This Abused and Neglected Cemetery

-
Image
Screen capture from Google Maps History In an exchange of emails this past week in both the main SKCGS group, and in the Washington-State-Genealogy group, many facts were revealed about the history of the I.O.O.F. Comet Lodge Cemetery, also known as the Old Burying Ground, the Georgetown Cemetery, the Graham Street Burying Ground and maybe more.  FindAGrave sums it up this way: "Since it was established in 1881, the Comet Lodge cemetery site has been whittled away to less than half its original 5 acres. Records are sketchy but it's safe to say that some 500 pioneers were buried here, atop unknown numbers of native Duwamish people. New burials ended in the 1930s. Since then, homes and streets were built on top of many of the plots as the neighborhood around the cemetery grew.  "Upkeep and ownership of the cemetery bounced between the city, civic groups, relatives of Comet Lodge residents, and nearby neighbors. For years, much of the property was allowed to deteriorate int...
Read more