Pain Avoidance in Genealogy Research

-

 Odd title to this blog, I know! But I've been learning some things in our latest study group, where we are reading "Research Like A Pro" by Diana Elder and we're following the strategy (RLP). I can't say that some of it is not painful. For instance, while compiling a Locality Research Guide I wanted to follow those meaty links I was finding so much! However, that step comes after we finish the critical parts of those research guides, and get into the Research Planning step. Here are the Research Planning steps, restated in my own words:


Research Like A Pro cover


1. State a clear objective, revised if necessary.

2. Summarize the important known facts

3. Clear, specific hypothesis (or multiple if necessary).

4. Identify the best sources to pursue to test your hypothesis/es.

5. Prioritize your research strategy.







Of course each of us chose a research subject before we began meeting together, and began to refine a research objective, summarize the sources we already had into a timeline, and began creating citations for those sources. So far, so good! Not too much pain yet. Yes, citations can be a pain, but they get easier with practice.

I found creating the locality guides eye-opening, and sort of fun in the beginning. Then as we began to share them with one another, I saw sources and databases others had added to their guides, and each of mine began to grow, and of course become more complete. 

Here's the painful part -- each is jam-packed with places I want to research! However, knowing what's ahead, I see that holding back, like waiting for Christmas to open the tempting presents under the tree, will be best. Also, when I realized I needed another, because my William McBee moved from East Tennessee to Greene County Illinois, then to Harrison County Missouri, north to Decatur County Iowa for a short while and then to Siskiyou County California to dig for gold. And perhaps he is buried in Coos County Oregon! Because I have no idea where he died, I'll need to search everywhere, but especially California and Oregon where he had family. Creating that Oregon guide has been painful. 

from https://youririshheritage.com/lessons/genealogical-proof-standard/
Perhaps this is why many of us, even when we know what the Genealogical Proof Standard (GPS) is, put off using it in our research. It's hard! It requires discipline, and rigor! And yet we know that when we use the research cycle that the GPS describes, we have the very best outcomes. Exhaustive search, with complete and accurate source citations, helps us evaluate and analyze the information we glean from the research, and what evidence is provided to answer our research questions, and meet our objective. This way we can resolve conflicts as they arise, which will lead to a sound, coherent written conclusion. 

I think the pain of preparation is worth it, because like doing good prep work before painting a room, the results are so much better, and in the end, it is less work and less pain. I have my locality guides now, and can add to them over the coming months as I research William McBee's family and any of the family's FAN Club (Friends, Associates, Neighbors) who migrated with them. In years to come, I can see that my temporary pain will end up easing my research and give me much more confidence that it is complete and "exhaustive."

What has been your experience? Does the pain of using the GPS end up helping you in the end?


Valorie Zimmerman


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Looking for a Needle in a Haystack? GAME CHANGER at FamilySearch

-
Image
Generated with Bing ImageCreator (AI), March 13, 2024 Where is YOUR Needle, Your Missing Record? Genealogical Proof Standard When we use the GPS (Genealogical Proof Standard) as our guide, we all know that "exhaustive research" can be both tedious and exhausting. Is life long enough to search page by page through all the counties where all the members of a family might have lived, paid taxes, bought, leased or sold property, made a will or died intestate? It is possible that the new Full Text Search at FamilySearch will  eventually  allow us to do just that. It has been estimated that 75% or more of the records at FamilySearch were browsable but not searchable; the only indexes those found in the records themselves. Those records are certainly attainable by using those indexes and browsing to the record of interest, but the process is tedious, often frustrating, and slow. And once found, the record must be read and transcribed to be useful. This new Full Text Search tackles a...
Read more

What's the Question?

-
Image
We genealogists are often told by experienced researchers how important it is to begin with a research question. I resisted doing this for a long time, but now that I use a series of questions to guide my research, the search is more focused and actually finds more of the history of the family I'm investigating. I use a Google Doc as the  research proceeds, where I keep the question(s), the plan, timelines, checklist of resources to search, etc. all in one place. I've seen others use spreadsheets in the same way, perhaps splitting up things in tabs (Excel or Google Sheets). I prefer a document because I add source citations as I find them and I can begin writing up the case right there in the doc as the hypotheses are proven. Specific Questions in Previous Successes As beginners we often have no clue how much and what details we already know about a person, event or relationship, so it's hard to specify what we want to know. But when looking back at successful research, it ...
Read more

Help Save This Abused and Neglected Cemetery

-
Image
Screen capture from Google Maps History In an exchange of emails this past week in both the main SKCGS group, and in the Washington-State-Genealogy group, many facts were revealed about the history of the I.O.O.F. Comet Lodge Cemetery, also known as the Old Burying Ground, the Georgetown Cemetery, the Graham Street Burying Ground and maybe more.  FindAGrave sums it up this way: "Since it was established in 1881, the Comet Lodge cemetery site has been whittled away to less than half its original 5 acres. Records are sketchy but it's safe to say that some 500 pioneers were buried here, atop unknown numbers of native Duwamish people. New burials ended in the 1930s. Since then, homes and streets were built on top of many of the plots as the neighborhood around the cemetery grew.  "Upkeep and ownership of the cemetery bounced between the city, civic groups, relatives of Comet Lodge residents, and nearby neighbors. For years, much of the property was allowed to deteriorate int...
Read more