Fun Writing a Proof Argument

-

How to Get from Research to Proving Your Case

 

Making your proof argument a fun project!

What do you do when you have finished a lot of research on one of your families? We all know what we're supposed to do -- write it up!

Write It Up

Devon Noel Lee from the Family History Fanatics in her series "Researching Over My Shoulder" has inspired me over the past couple of years to get better about this. When tackling a bit sticky family, I now generally start a new Google Sheet, and start roughing out a plan. As I work, I try to keep it updated with records found (and not found), other notes, and lately, adding citations as I go. Our Persons Of Interest group was an excellent impetus for that, because if you have written a detailed timeline for your person or family, it is much easier to have others look at your work and offer ideas and suggestions you have not yet considered. Of course not everything we write is a proof, but not every family is easy, and not every locality and time has enough records which offer direct evidence. Also, sources are not evidence, they are containers of information, items which give us the raw material we use to create proofs. Evidence is a result of our attention to detail and reasoning powers.

Evidence Analysis

Lately I've started writing about my McBee family, trying to prove my third-great-grandparents' family, but what I've written so far has not been as clear as I would like. In preparation for studying Elizabeth Shown Mills' Evidence Explained first two chapters, I read chapter one, "Fundamentals of Evidence Analysis." This reminded me of a Rootstech sesson I recently had watched, so I re-watched "Where’s the Proof? Organizing and Writing Genealogical Findings, Part 2" on Youtube and found some concepts I think will make my reasoning and writing much simpler and clear. Lisa Stokes, AG,  introduced a "Model for a Well-Written Proof." 

Presenting the Sources

The part that really grabbed me was the portion about presenting the sources, analyzing and correlating between the building blocks of your proof. 

What really caught my eye was the charts she built for analysis. The first step is eliminating irrelevant sources and information, so that you are zeroing in on the proof you are building and presenting only the most compelling, reliable and convincing evidence. Remember that the same source can be used for multiple proofs with relevant information for each building block.

Eliminate the Irrelevant

She begins by listing all the sources which provide evidence to support your each point of your argument, such as relationship to parents. Here is my rough draft from the Google Doc table.

Source list for each building block of proof argument

Questions to ask as you evaluate your evidence:

  • What is most compelling? What convinced you that you had answered your research question?
  • How reliable is each source? Discuss any concerns you have. 
  • Who was the informant, and how reliable are they? How soon after witnessing the event did they give their evidence?
  • What evidence in the source convinces you that the person is question is the one described in the source?

Nitty Gritty

Now it's time to fine-tune your argument by analyzing your sources, information and evidence in detail. This can be done in another table, as below. 


Fine-tuning the proof argument

As you build your argument, ask: 

  • Does the information you have extracted from your source correlate with the evidence you will present?
  • Is the compilation of evidence compelling and does each building block of your argument support the other parts?
  • Are there conflicts which must be resolved?

Arrange your source and information in the best order, then in another column note the type of evidence (direct, indirect) and anything else that needs mentioning.

More Analysis > Easier Writing

To sum up, arrange the sources and evidence in each proof separately, then arrange the building blocks for the entire proof argument so that each builds on the previous proof. If you have done all of this in notes or chart form, your writing will flow, and your summation will be compelling. 

Organize the Case

So: begin by telling them what you are going to tell your readers, beginning with a simple, clear title, and introductory material. Then lay out your proofs in the order they make the best sense, and finally, state your confident conclusion which answers your research question.

After the sources and their information and evidence are analyzed, decide on the order of importance to present your proofs so that they build on one another in either the most compelling or the most logical way.

Depending on the nature of your evidence, it can be presented in narrative form, tables, bullets, abstracts, and in any other form that makes sense, including maps.

Post-script

I'll be watching these three videos more than once as I continue to work on my proof argument "Who Were the Parents of Angeline McBee?" because as I began to demonstrate the steps to building that paper, I began to notice holes in my research. Just today I've requested the probate file for George Henry McBee, who presumably died in Decatur County, Iowa between 1870 when he's living with his youngest son George Henry McBee Jr., and 1880 when he is not found, and Jr. drops the "junior." Those records have been filmed, but can only be viewed in a Family History Center. 

We all know that research is never done, but in my case, the paper cannot yet be finished. When it is, I'll brag about it here!

Valorie Cowan Zimmerman


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Looking for a Needle in a Haystack? GAME CHANGER at FamilySearch

-
Image
Generated with Bing ImageCreator (AI), March 13, 2024 Where is YOUR Needle, Your Missing Record? Genealogical Proof Standard When we use the GPS (Genealogical Proof Standard) as our guide, we all know that "exhaustive research" can be both tedious and exhausting. Is life long enough to search page by page through all the counties where all the members of a family might have lived, paid taxes, bought, leased or sold property, made a will or died intestate? It is possible that the new Full Text Search at FamilySearch will  eventually  allow us to do just that. It has been estimated that 75% or more of the records at FamilySearch were browsable but not searchable; the only indexes those found in the records themselves. Those records are certainly attainable by using those indexes and browsing to the record of interest, but the process is tedious, often frustrating, and slow. And once found, the record must be read and transcribed to be useful. This new Full Text Search tackles a...
Read more

What's the Question?

-
Image
We genealogists are often told by experienced researchers how important it is to begin with a research question. I resisted doing this for a long time, but now that I use a series of questions to guide my research, the search is more focused and actually finds more of the history of the family I'm investigating. I use a Google Doc as the  research proceeds, where I keep the question(s), the plan, timelines, checklist of resources to search, etc. all in one place. I've seen others use spreadsheets in the same way, perhaps splitting up things in tabs (Excel or Google Sheets). I prefer a document because I add source citations as I find them and I can begin writing up the case right there in the doc as the hypotheses are proven. Specific Questions in Previous Successes As beginners we often have no clue how much and what details we already know about a person, event or relationship, so it's hard to specify what we want to know. But when looking back at successful research, it ...
Read more

Help Save This Abused and Neglected Cemetery

-
Image
Screen capture from Google Maps History In an exchange of emails this past week in both the main SKCGS group, and in the Washington-State-Genealogy group, many facts were revealed about the history of the I.O.O.F. Comet Lodge Cemetery, also known as the Old Burying Ground, the Georgetown Cemetery, the Graham Street Burying Ground and maybe more.  FindAGrave sums it up this way: "Since it was established in 1881, the Comet Lodge cemetery site has been whittled away to less than half its original 5 acres. Records are sketchy but it's safe to say that some 500 pioneers were buried here, atop unknown numbers of native Duwamish people. New burials ended in the 1930s. Since then, homes and streets were built on top of many of the plots as the neighborhood around the cemetery grew.  "Upkeep and ownership of the cemetery bounced between the city, civic groups, relatives of Comet Lodge residents, and nearby neighbors. For years, much of the property was allowed to deteriorate int...
Read more