New FamilySearch Search Pages: Grumbles and Thanks 

-

Grumbles and Thanks 

Online you will find both, as people discuss the new FamilySearch search interfaces, just in time for Family History Month. Change is always difficult! Fortunately they have created a new landing page to get users oriented. 

New Landing Page

In the image below, there is a circle around a big change, underlined one way to get back much of what you might miss from the old page, and pointed an arrow to a link to get a whole lot more help. 


Circled: Birth or Death year - This can be a time-saver when you know only one date. 

However, the underlined link is usually where you will start: MORE OPTIONS.

MORE OPTIONS screen

If you want Exact Search for any field, the arrow shows where to enable it. Usually this is only useful if you know precisely what you want to find. 

The images above are the top of the new page. Scroll down just a bit, and there is more. 

TIPS FOR EFFECTIVE SEARCHES on the left leads to a separate page called Best practices and search tips for historical records. A look at that later. 

Landing Page: Scroll Down!

First, the rest of the landing page; each side separately. On the left: Find a Collection.


On the right, Search by Place.


The two search boxes above replace some of the choices in the old Search drop-down. 

The new shorter and simpler version is to the left.






Search from a Profile

To be honest, I rarely use the Search > Records entry; I usually search directly from the profile:

Search from the profile: FamilySearch, Ancestry, FindMyPast, MyHeritage, Geneanet, Filae, Google

Results Pages

This is where I saw the largest changes. The search parameters have switched right/left positions with the results. 

This is the new top of the preliminary search results for Catherine Delee from above:


Notice the filters across the top. Most of these have options; click to open and choose. As an example, here is the Race filter, with both Black choices (Black-Neg. and Black-Mulatto) selected. I'm searching for Black people right now, so this is a game changer!



The new Search form is now on the right and has a new look. Notice the circled PREFERENCES, which gives lots of choices about display of your results. Arrow points to the scroll bar; be sure to scroll down to see much more; or click FEWER OPTIONS.

More Help

The crew who created and tested the face of the site has written about how to use the changes to your benefit: FamilySearch Employee Responding to Search Page Feedback. 

Here are some key takeaways:

Selecting one (or more) collections as a filter: Previously while on the search results page, there was a tab that said "Collections" from there you could check which collections you wanted to search in and apply the filter. This feature has been moved to the section labeled "Filter Results", there is a small button called "Collections". When selected a side panel will pop out with all the same features as the previous version. We have added new features to help you in your research here as well. Now you can search for a specific collection and select it quickly by using the search bar at the top of the side panel. This change was made to make the collections filter work right alongside all of our other filters. Now all of our filters are together in one place.

This was the most important one to me. I often filter by collection, and yet it makes sense to put all the filters in one place. It was years before I noticed the Collections tab! Now it is impossible to miss all the filters, right up top.

Another quote from the blog post:

In regards to performance or speed, we have also done extensive testing on the time it takes to load the page, and have concluded that load times should be reduced by ~30% in comparison to the old page.

I have found this to be true. From search to results is almost instant now.

I know it's a big change, but it's an important one that we currently believe is in the right direction that allows our expert users to still have all the tools they need to be effective (and adding some new ones) while making the page simpler and less intimidating as we invite new users to learn more about their family.

Search Tips 

Finally, the page Search Tips, linked at the top-left of the new landing page, at familysearch.org/help/helpcenter/article/when-i-am-searching-historical-records-what-are-the-best-practices-and-tips, even experts can find useful reminders here. It covers both best practices and field-specific advice, like this one for First Names: "Enter the first and middle names of the individual. Your search results will ignore the order of the names." News to me!

 We would love to hear about your experiences with the new FamilySearch search interface. Write a comment!

Valorie Zimmerman


Comments

  1. MaryLynnOctober 4, 2021 at 2:17 PM

    Thanks for this information!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Janet E.May 12, 2022 at 5:37 PM

    I will have to try this & hope for better results.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Looking for a Needle in a Haystack? GAME CHANGER at FamilySearch

-
Image
Generated with Bing ImageCreator (AI), March 13, 2024 Where is YOUR Needle, Your Missing Record? Genealogical Proof Standard When we use the GPS (Genealogical Proof Standard) as our guide, we all know that "exhaustive research" can be both tedious and exhausting. Is life long enough to search page by page through all the counties where all the members of a family might have lived, paid taxes, bought, leased or sold property, made a will or died intestate? It is possible that the new Full Text Search at FamilySearch will  eventually  allow us to do just that. It has been estimated that 75% or more of the records at FamilySearch were browsable but not searchable; the only indexes those found in the records themselves. Those records are certainly attainable by using those indexes and browsing to the record of interest, but the process is tedious, often frustrating, and slow. And once found, the record must be read and transcribed to be useful. This new Full Text Search tackles a
Read more

What's the Question?

-
Image
We genealogists are often told by experienced researchers how important it is to begin with a research question. I resisted doing this for a long time, but now that I use a series of questions to guide my research, the search is more focused and actually finds more of the history of the family I'm investigating. I use a Google Doc as the  research proceeds, where I keep the question(s), the plan, timelines, checklist of resources to search, etc. all in one place. I've seen others use spreadsheets in the same way, perhaps splitting up things in tabs (Excel or Google Sheets). I prefer a document because I add source citations as I find them and I can begin writing up the case right there in the doc as the hypotheses are proven. Specific Questions in Previous Successes As beginners we often have no clue how much and what details we already know about a person, event or relationship, so it's hard to specify what we want to know. But when looking back at successful research, it
Read more

Help Save This Abused and Neglected Cemetery

-
Image
Screen capture from Google Maps History In an exchange of emails this past week in both the main SKCGS group, and in the Washington-State-Genealogy group, many facts were revealed about the history of the I.O.O.F. Comet Lodge Cemetery, also known as the Old Burying Ground, the Georgetown Cemetery, the Graham Street Burying Ground and maybe more.  FindAGrave sums it up this way: "Since it was established in 1881, the Comet Lodge cemetery site has been whittled away to less than half its original 5 acres. Records are sketchy but it's safe to say that some 500 pioneers were buried here, atop unknown numbers of native Duwamish people. New burials ended in the 1930s. Since then, homes and streets were built on top of many of the plots as the neighborhood around the cemetery grew.  "Upkeep and ownership of the cemetery bounced between the city, civic groups, relatives of Comet Lodge residents, and nearby neighbors. For years, much of the property was allowed to deteriorate int
Read more